老哥以為自己種族歧視，發(fā)現(xiàn)其實(shí)只是嫌貧愛富
Anon learns something about himself
譯文簡(jiǎn)介
建議學(xué)習(xí)東方先進(jìn)扶貧經(jīng)驗(yàn)
正文翻譯
>發(fā)現(xiàn)我對(duì)于絕大多數(shù)的少數(shù)群體都非常厭惡
>擔(dān)心我可能是種族主義者
>打算試試我到底是不是種族主義者
>跟同事的一個(gè)朋友出去喝了幾杯
>他是黑人
>而且挺好一人
>原來我只是討厭窮人
媽耶還好我不是種族主義者
評(píng)論翻譯
很贊 ( 2 )
收藏
Anon is a liberal
老哥是個(gè)自由派
Same frankly. I fucking hate seeing people poor. I hate seeing them go without. I hate seeing them suffer. I hate that children can''t graduate due to lunch debt. I hate that being poor ironically is more costly. I hate food deserts. I hate late payment fees that rise daily.
說實(shí)話我也這么想。我他媽受不了看見別人過窮日子。我受不了看他們將就。我受不了看他們?cè)庾?。我受不了看那些孩子們因?yàn)榍肺顼堝X而畢不了業(yè)。我受不了當(dāng)窮人甚至比當(dāng)有錢人開銷還大。我受不了浪費(fèi)食物。我受不了每天都上漲的違約罰金。
oh I just hate seeing poor people cause they don''t have money
哦我只是不喜歡看見窮人，因?yàn)樗麄儧]錢
Just pay them to fuck off, then. Unless you can''t afford it
那就給他們錢讓他們滾蛋啊。除非你給不起。
Stupid poor people, what kind of dumbass let''s themself be born poor
窮人真夠蠢的，什么樣的蠢貨會(huì)讓自己投胎在窮人家啊。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
ur homeless ? lM just buy a house
你無家可歸？笑死我了不會(huì)買個(gè)房子嗎
What do you mean your homeless cause your house flooded, just sell your house an move somewhere else!
你說自己因?yàn)榉孔颖凰土藷o家可歸是什么意思，把房子賣了搬到別的地方不就行了嗎！
I hate seeing people fall victim to the awful traps designed by the wealthy to keep poor people poor
我討厭看到人們不小心陷入那些被有錢人設(shè)計(jì)的，用來保證窮人窮下去的陷阱。
Poor people should absolutely not shop at WalMart type stores, because it is making the rich, richer. But they are too poor not to shop at WalMart.
窮人絕對(duì)不應(yīng)該在沃爾瑪那種商店購物，因?yàn)槟菚?huì)讓有錢人更有錢。但他們又太窮，只能去沃爾瑪。
Hijack Walmart delivery trucks
可以劫沃爾瑪?shù)呢涇?/b>
I hate that corporations make profit off people that can’t even cover all their bills and need food stamps
我討厭那些在付不起自己賬單、需要食物券的窮人身上壓榨利潤的公司。
Anon hangs out with rich minorities
老哥跟有錢的少數(shù)群體出去玩
有錢的少數(shù)群體因?yàn)槔细绺F而嫌棄他
老哥變成了種族主義者
if you hate poor people so much you should give them money so they are no longer poor
假如你這么討厭窮人，你應(yīng)該給他們錢讓他們不再窮
oh, if only it were that easy....
噢，要真有那么簡(jiǎn)單就好了……
it’s surprisingly close to that easy.
實(shí)際上差不多就是那么簡(jiǎn)單。
And it doesn''t just help them, it helps their community as well
并且給錢不止幫助他們自己，還會(huì)幫助他們的社區(qū)
Lol thanks for the study I saved this to use against poor conservatives who think Governmental assistance is detrimental to the economy.
哈哈哈感謝你發(fā)來的這份研究，我會(huì)用這份研究來說服那群認(rèn)為政府幫助對(duì)經(jīng)濟(jì)有害的保守派的。
Actually conservatives are doing it right by making everyone poor, we all are equal and no longer will we hate poor people because we’ll all be fighting over basic necessities instead. Conservatives care about equality
事實(shí)上保守派做的也沒什么問題，只要讓每個(gè)人都沒錢，我們就人人平等了，也就不會(huì)厭惡窮人了，因?yàn)槲覀兌嫉靡黄馂閷?duì)基本的生活必需品斗爭(zhēng)了。保守派才是真的在乎平等啊。
LM every other time I end up "debating" a right winger I''m told to stop watching a bunch of cable news that I never watch. To them, the only "true" news is from right wing sources and they don''t realize they''re buying into the exact thing they''re yelling at me about.
哈哈哈哈每次我跟一個(gè)右翼“辯論”到最后他們都告訴我別看某些我從來就沒看過的電視新聞。對(duì)于他們來說，唯一“真實(shí)”的媒體來源就是右翼媒體，他們壓根意識(shí)不到自己正在身體力行他們讓我不要做的事情。
右翼人好像覺得只有那些反映他們自己世界觀的新聞才是“中立”，“無偏見”，“真實(shí)”的。他們對(duì)“現(xiàn)實(shí)世界是偏向保守的”這種邏輯讓他們只接受保守主義的“事實(shí)”，因?yàn)槟强隙ㄊ菍?duì)的。完全是循環(huán)論證。
Do you think throwing money at the homeless drug addicts downtown is going to stop them from being poor?
你認(rèn)為往那些到處都是無家可歸的癮君子的郊區(qū)扔錢會(huì)讓他們脫離貧困嗎？
那些精神有問題的人呢？
你認(rèn)為這兩種無家可歸者需要多少錢才能擺脫貧困？
the poor are a much larger class than just homeless Addicts...
窮人遠(yuǎn)不止無家可歸的癮君子一種……
no you''re either rich, or a poor drug addicted degenerate. no inbetween
不，你要么有錢，要么是沒錢又染了毒癮的人渣。沒有第三種。
don''t be dumb. you''re either rich and addicted to Cocaine, or poor and addicted to Meth.
別犯傻了。你要么是個(gè)吸可卡因的富人，要么是個(gè)吸甲基安非他命的窮人。
Just like how liberals think you''re either a exploited impoverished worker or a hedge fund billionaire, right?
就像自由派覺得你要么是個(gè)被剝削的沒錢的工人，要么是個(gè)對(duì)沖基金億萬富翁，對(duì)吧？
and early childhood education! that makes all the difference in the world. but who cares about statistics and long term health of your community amirite?
還有早期兒童教育！這方面簡(jiǎn)直太重要了。但誰會(huì)在乎統(tǒng)計(jì)學(xué)和對(duì)社區(qū)群體長期健康有好處的事情呢？
Yes! Government nowadays insists in creating more and more opportunities to poor people enter in universities, but it won''t work, simply because it would create bad professionals since most of them had a shitty early education.
沒錯(cuò)！政府現(xiàn)在堅(jiān)持讓越來越多的窮人有機(jī)會(huì)上大學(xué)，但根本沒用，完全是因?yàn)榈胶髞硭麄円仓荒艹蔀椴顒诺膶I(yè)人士，因?yàn)樗麄兊脑缙诮逃旧隙己懿顒拧?/b>
I prefer the Reagan way
我更傾向于里根的方式
Me too! Flooding poor neighborhoods with copious amounts of Cocaine is a good way to solve poverty
我也是！往窮困社區(qū)里輸送大量的可卡因?qū)嵲谑亲畎舻南麥缲毨У姆绞搅恕?/b>
Liberals be like
這不就是自由派
Aren''t libs trying to raise minimum wage, and some support UBI and free shit?
自由派不是在提倡提高最低薪酬，有些人還支持統(tǒng)一基礎(chǔ)薪資和免費(fèi)攻擊之類的玩意兒?jiǎn)幔?/b>
Liberals and leftists aren''t the same thing, many liberals hold Republican beliefs.
自由主義者和左翼并不是一回事。很多自由主義者也贊同共和黨的想法。
Ah, so that''s the distinction. I agree completely but people tend to use those terms interchangeably
啊，所以區(qū)別在這里。我完全贊同，但人們總是傾向于把這兩個(gè)詞搞混。
What would you call a progressive that still thinks capitalism is good? I''ve seen most lefties calling these people liberals, but most of them obviously don''t hold conservative views.
那你管那些仍然認(rèn)為資本主義很好的進(jìn)步主義者叫什么呢？我知道的絕大多數(shù)左人都管他們叫自由主義者，但他們的看法顯然不是保守主義的。
They hold economically conservative views, but socially progressive ones. I''m not sure if that qualifies as liberal, but it''s definitely hard to justify
他們?cè)诮?jīng)濟(jì)上選擇保守主義，但在社會(huì)上選擇進(jìn)步主義。我不太確定這算不算是自由派，但顯然很難界定。
Liberal covers a lot of ground. Classical Liberalism is pretty mainstream republicanism. Ordoliberalism is Obama / Biden ''Blue Dog Democrat''.
自由派包括很大一部分。經(jīng)典自由主義放到今天基本就是主流共和黨的想法。秩序自由主義是奧巴馬和拜登的“藍(lán)狗民主黨”的想法。
新自由主義者既可以是帝國主義者，無政府資本主義者，也可以是秩序自由主義者，看你問誰。reddit上的新自由主義版是中左翼，基本上都支持提高基礎(chǔ)薪酬，推動(dòng)統(tǒng)一基礎(chǔ)工資，擴(kuò)張醫(yī)保范圍，等等。
標(biāo)簽有時(shí)候不那么管用，并且從“覺得資本主義通常來說都是好制度的社會(huì)民主黨”到“普拉格大學(xué)嘉賓主持”，這些人都可以是自由派
I agree, which is why I find it strange that "Liberals be like" and "must be a liberal" is so pervasive. And vice versa, for that matter.
我同意，所以我發(fā)現(xiàn)“這就是自由派”和“肯定是自由派”這種說法總是能蠱惑人心，反之亦然。
因?yàn)槿藗兛偸怯谩白杂膳伞眮碚f“民主黨人”，并且人們對(duì)“民主黨人”的概念也很含混不清，所以什么東西都經(jīng)常被說錯(cuò)。保守主義和共和黨人也是如此。
Yeah. I think the political compass has rotted people''s brains a bit, with people who legitimately think Biden is authoritarian. Russia''s President literally hired assassins on his political rivals. Even Macron has been pushing some concerningly authoritarian anti-islamist messaging lately, and France is practically synonymous with liberty.
沒錯(cuò)。我覺得政治光譜已經(jīng)把人們的腦子給整爛了，甚至有人堅(jiān)定不移地認(rèn)為拜登是個(gè)集權(quán)主義者?？偨y(tǒng)真的在雇傭殺手去暗殺他的政敵。甚至馬克龍最近都在推進(jìn)一些令人擔(dān)憂的反伊斯蘭極權(quán)主義信號(hào)，而法國一直以來都是和自由這個(gè)詞劃等號(hào)的。
總地來說我嘗試避免給別人貼政治標(biāo)簽、解釋政策觀點(diǎn)?？赡芤ǜL的時(shí)間才能把道理講清楚，但是至少你確實(shí)可以把道理講清楚。
Liberals are more into hating the rich for not helping the poor
自由派更傾向于因?yàn)楦蝗瞬粠椭F人而痛恨富人。
No... That''s more people on the economically left side of the political spectrum. Liberals are right wing, economically. Pro-capitalism, and all that.
不……那更像是政治光譜上站在經(jīng)濟(jì)左翼的人。自由主義者在經(jīng)濟(jì)上是右翼，支持資本主義，等等。
Perhaps he is talking about America liberals. They seem to be a little hard to distinguish them from democrats which is quite weird because the seem to be more socialist than anything
或許他說的是美國的自由派。他們好像和民主黨之間有點(diǎn)難以區(qū)分，因?yàn)樵幃惖氖撬麄兒孟窀鼉A向于社會(huì)主義。
America liberals? Liberal means the same thing everywhere. It’s a specific ideology. And Democrats are liberals.
美國的自由派？自由派到哪兒都是一個(gè)意思。那是一種意識(shí)形態(tài)。并且民主黨算自由主義者。
自由主義者不是左翼。民主黨是美國的左翼政黨，民主黨是自由主義人士，但這是因?yàn)槊绹麄€(gè)國家都是極右的。放到歐洲，民主黨頂多是中間主義者。
而且有社會(huì)主義傾向的人不是自由派。他們是左翼。
Actually I said it jokingly, making fun of the bizarre politics in American. Were I live the liberals are actually on the right side of the spectrum and I know this. I agree with what you said
事實(shí)上我是在開玩笑，在拿美國光怪陸離的政治逗樂。在我生活的地方自由派也算是政治光譜的右翼，我知道這一點(diǎn)。我同意你所說的話。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處