QA問答：如果俄羅斯命令其63艘核潛艇全部靠近英國并同時開火，英國就會被摧毀。北約會冒第三次世界大戰(zhàn)的風(fēng)險，還是會退縮？

If Russia ordered all of its 63 nuclear submarines to go close to the UK and fire all at once, the UK would be destroyed. Would NATO risk WWIII, or would they back off?

2023-12-15 Phelps 6260 29 4 收藏糾錯&舉報

譯文簡介

如果俄羅斯命令其63艘核潛艇全部靠近英國并同時開火，英國就會被摧毀。北約會冒第三次世界大戰(zhàn)的風(fēng)險，還是會退縮？

正文翻譯

如果俄羅斯命令其63艘核潛艇全部靠近英國并同時開火，英國就會被摧毀。北約會冒第三次世界大戰(zhàn)的風(fēng)險，還是會退縮？

評論翻譯

評論翻譯：

George Dukesh
Dick head.

蠢貨。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Russia doesn’t have 63 nuclear Submarines,
It has a total of 58 submarines ( of which, less than half are seaworthy at any one time.)

俄羅斯并沒有63艘核潛艇，它總共有58艘潛艇（其中不到一半在任何時候都是適航的）。

Of the 58, 21 are diesel “attack” submarines, 17 are nuclear powered attack submarines. Attack submarines only attack ships and other submarines.

在這58艘潛艇中，有21艘是柴電“攻擊”潛艇，17艘是核動力攻擊潛艇。攻擊潛艇只襲擊艦船和其他潛艇。

It has 11 ballistic missile submarines ( 4 operational at any one point)

它有11艘彈道導(dǎo)彈潛艇（任何時候只有4艘在運(yùn)行）。

9 nuclear powered cruise missile submarines ( 4 maximum seaworthy)

9艘核動力巡航導(dǎo)彈潛艇（最多只有4艘適航）。

So it has 8 submarines that could attack U.K.

因此，它有8艘可以攻擊英國的潛艇。

Except that most would be sunk before they could fire a shot. We know where every one is, 24/7.

除非大多數(shù)在它們開火之前就被擊沉。我們隨時都知道它們的位置。

Kurtis Rogers
Russia would be no more.

俄羅斯將不復(fù)存在。

Our subs will be on a kill mission. Mutually Assured Destruction isn't just an acronym, you've got 4 nuclear subs with a little under a thousand pissed off seamen - their families are either dead or in danger of being dead. They're going to unload on Russia.

我們的潛艇將執(zhí)行殲滅任務(wù)。相互保證的毀滅不僅僅是一個首字母縮寫，你有4艘核潛艇，下面有近千名憤怒的海員——他們的家人要么已經(jīng)死亡，要么處于死亡的危險之中。他們將對俄羅斯進(jìn)行打擊。

Russia will cease to function as a country as the western cities are wiped out, Volgograd, Moscow, St.Peterburg. Gone.

隨著西部城市被摧毀，伏爾加格勒、莫斯科、圣彼得堡，俄羅斯將停止作為一個國家的運(yùn)作。消失了。

See? This doesn't work for Russia. Putin might threaten nuclear war but we'll fucking finish it

看到了嗎？這對俄羅斯行不通。普京可能威脅要進(jìn)行核戰(zhàn)爭，但我們將會結(jié)束它。

Freddy Smith
Let's look at the UK at its most unprepared. Even in times of total peace, the UK could launch 40 independently targeted warheads at Russia from a single, half-armed Vanguard sub. So, if the British wanted to, they could wake up tomorrow morning and bring Russia to its knees by totally destroying Moscow, St Petersburg, Ekaterinburg, Novosibirsk, Volgograd, Archangelsk, Omsk, Ufa, Vladivostok, Murmansk, Rostov, Nizhnynovgorod, Krasnoyarsk, every oil and gas pipeline and every port. They could do this without any permission or help from any other country. If there was a scintilla of life left in London, the UK could also move, take or destroy much of Russia's deposited wealth and gut its banking system.

讓我們看看英國最沒有準(zhǔn)備的時候。即使在完全和平的時期，英國可以從一艘只裝備了一半的先鋒級潛艇上發(fā)射40枚獨(dú)立目標(biāo)的核彈頭。因此，如果英國愿意，他們可以在明天早上醒來，通過徹底摧毀莫斯科、圣彼得堡、葉卡捷琳堡、新西伯利亞、伏爾加格勒、阿爾漢格爾斯克、鄂木斯克、烏法、符拉迪沃斯托克、摩爾曼斯克、羅斯托夫、下諾夫哥羅德、克拉斯諾亞爾斯克、每一條油氣管道和每一個港口，將俄羅斯徹底摧毀。他們可以在不需要任何其他國家的允許或幫助的情況下做到這一點(diǎn)。如果倫敦還殘存一絲生機(jī)，英國還可以移動、奪取或摧毀俄羅斯的大部分存款，并瓦解其銀行系統(tǒng)。

However, in the circumstances under which Russia was capable and willing to destroy the United Kingdom, the British would have almost certainly deployed two more subs and fully armed ones too. That's 240 warheads, not 40. The United Kingdom could, alone, destroy all meaningful life, society and statehood in Russia permanently, even in a situation where the UK no longer exists.

然而，在俄羅斯有能力并愿意摧毀英國的情況下，英國幾乎肯定會部署另外兩艘潛艇，而且這兩艘潛艇將會是全武裝狀態(tài)。那將是240枚核彈頭，而不是40枚。英國單獨(dú)就能永久摧毀俄羅斯的所有有意義的生活、社會和國家體制，即使在英國不存在的情況下。

In addition, it is almost inconceivable that France would tolerate a nuclear attack on an ally so close to its own territory. Even if America did nothing, France would be very likely to match or better any British response. Basically, France and the UK, should they wish to, could wipe out most of the world without the permission or assistance of any other ally.

此外，法國幾乎無法想象會容忍對一個那么靠近自己領(lǐng)土的盟友進(jìn)行核攻擊。即使美國什么都不做，法國極有可能會匹敵或超過英國的任何回應(yīng)。基本上，法國和英國，如果他們愿意，可以在沒有任何其他盟友的允許或協(xié)助的情況下，摧毀大部分世界。

These questions are silly. The Russians know that the decision to wipe out France or the UK would involve the certain destruction of Russia. France and the UK know the opposite is also true.

這些問題是愚蠢的。俄羅斯知道消滅法國或英國的決定將導(dǎo)致俄羅斯的滅亡。法國和英國也知道相反的情況同樣成立。

This is all without involving the USA. If America is on board, it becomes more ridiculous still. Mutually assured destruction, and assured return-strike posture, baby. It's a no win.

這還沒有涉及到美國。如果美國也參與其中，情況將變得更加荒謬。相互毀滅，確?；?fù)舻淖藨B(tài)，寶貝。這是一個毫無勝算的局面。

Michael Paul
Every Russian ship that carries the big-ba-da-booms is followed by surface vessels and stealth subs.

每艘攜帶大型核彈頭的俄羅斯艦船都會受到水面艦船和隱形潛艇的跟蹤。

They have about a dozen Ballistic missile subs, and 1/2 dozen cruise missile subs, not 63. They have a few more “attack subs” which don’t have missiles.

他們有大約十幾艘彈道導(dǎo)彈潛艇，以及半打巡航導(dǎo)彈潛艇，而不是63艘。他們還有一些沒有導(dǎo)彈的“攻擊潛艇”。

As soon as any one of them opens up its boom tubes, they will all get sunk.

一旦它們中的任何一艘打開核導(dǎo)彈發(fā)射管，它們都將被全部擊沉。

More likely is that those boom tubes don’t open on 1/2 the subs, 1/2 of the missiles don’t launch, 1/2 don’t go anywhere, 1/2 go to the wrong place and land in the ocean, and much more than 1/2 don’t go boom.

更有可能的情況是，這些核導(dǎo)彈發(fā)射管并不會在一半的潛艇上打開，一半的導(dǎo)彈沒有發(fā)射，一半的導(dǎo)彈沒有飛行到任何地方，一半的導(dǎo)彈飛到錯誤的地方并墜入海洋，超過一半的導(dǎo)彈沒有爆炸。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

They have aircraft randomly falling out of the sky. Recently, their prized possession supersonic bomber go boom. They’ve had show-craft fall down and crash. They have tanks drive off cliffs. Their stuff doesn’t work.

他們的飛機(jī)隨機(jī)掉出天空。最近，他們引以為傲的超音速轟炸機(jī)爆炸了。他們的飛機(jī)表演時摔倒并墜毀。他們的坦克從懸崖上開下。他們的東西不起作用。

In an ICBM test a few month ago, it didn’t work. Putty was pisssed, so they did another one and put enough working parts on it to make one work for Putty.

幾個月前進(jìn)行的洲際彈道導(dǎo)彈測試失敗了。普京生氣了，所以他們進(jìn)行了另一次測試，并放上足夠的工作部件，讓測試對普京有效。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

If they did get some shots off, they’ve just started a full WW. Poland, Lithuania, Latvia, and Estonia would be in a competition to see who can take over Moscow first. Finland would also be in the running, but they’d want to stop over at St. Pete on the way.

如果他們成功發(fā)射了一些導(dǎo)彈，他們剛剛開始了一場全面的世界大戰(zhàn)。波蘭、立陶宛、拉脫維亞和愛沙尼亞將競相爭奪誰能先占領(lǐng)莫斯科。芬蘭也可能參與其中，但他們可能會在途中停留在圣彼得堡。

Simon
The Uk nuclear submarines form a second strike capability.

英國核潛艇構(gòu)成了第二次打擊的能力。

If Russia nukes the UK then the launches will be tracked and before the nukes have even landed in the UK, Moscow and St Petersburg will already be targeted for destruction.

如果俄羅斯對英國進(jìn)行核打擊，那么發(fā)射將會被跟蹤，在核彈甚至著陸英國之前，莫斯科和圣彼得堡已經(jīng)被定為摧毀目標(biāo)。

It’s called “mutually assured destruction” for a reason.

這就是有充分原因稱之為“相互保證的毀滅”。

Angela Birch
Russia has a total of 58 submarines of which 11 are armed with nuclear weapons. The others are powered by nuclear technology not armed with nuclear weapons.

俄羅斯總共有58艘潛艇，其中11艘攜帶核武器。其他的由核技術(shù)提供動力，但沒有攜帶核武器。

Now as for the damage a 10kiloton nuclear weapon will have a severe damage area of under 1 mile with a light damage area extending out 6 miles. But here is Russia’s real problem. The eleven nuclear armed subs will cease to exist after firing 1 weapon because each has a submarine following it which will destroy the sub if it fires.

至于一枚10千噸核武器造成的破壞，其嚴(yán)重破壞區(qū)域范圍不到1英里，輕微破壞區(qū)域延伸到6英里。但這是俄羅斯真正的問題。這11艘攜帶核武器的潛艇在發(fā)射1枚核武器后將停止存在，因為每艘潛艇后面都有一艘潛艇跟隨，如果它發(fā)射，將會摧毀該潛艇。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

So the UK wouldn’t be destroyed. IT could have as much as 11 areas where there could theoretically be damage up to 40 miles wide with severe damage of up to 8 miles wide depending on the specific kilo-tonnage of the weapon’s used it wouldn’t destroy the UK or anything close.

因此，英國不會被消滅。理論上，可能有多達(dá)11個區(qū)域可能受到損害，寬度最大可達(dá)40英里，嚴(yán)重破壞可達(dá)8英里，具體取決于使用的武器的具體噸位，它不會摧毀英國或任何相鄰地區(qū)。

However NATO has nuclear armed submarines as well and more of them than Russia has as well as submarines that can be armed with nuclear armed missiles. Guess where they are continually aimed at, the operations and control of the Russian military.

然而，北約也擁有攜帶核武器的潛艇，而且比俄羅斯擁有更多，還有可以攜帶核武器導(dǎo)彈的潛艇。猜猜它們不斷瞄準(zhǔn)的地方是哪里，是俄羅斯軍隊的運(yùn)營和控制。

IF Russia was so incredibly stupid as to fire one nuclear weapon the entire might of NATO would crAsh Down on it. NATO has more nuclear weapons, well maintained overall more modern. It has a military 5 times as large as Russia’s also well trained, well maintained and well supplied.

如果俄羅斯如此愚蠢，發(fā)射一枚核武器，整個北約的力量將干掉它。北約擁有更多的核武器，整體維護(hù)更現(xiàn)代化。它的軍隊規(guī)模是俄羅斯的5倍，同樣經(jīng)過良好的訓(xùn)練，擁有充足的供給。

Russia’s population and military control is in a far smaller area, almost all west of the Urals. A more compact target. NATO has a land area 6 times larger with a far more widely distributed population 10 times as large as Russia’s, and redundant areas of military control.

俄羅斯的人口和軍事控制范圍遠(yuǎn)遠(yuǎn)較小，幾乎全部位于烏拉爾山以西。是一個更緊湊的目標(biāo)。北約的陸地面積是俄羅斯的6倍，分布更廣泛的人口是俄羅斯的10倍，還有軍事控制的冗余區(qū)域。

Factually Russia has no possibility of success. They are too weak militarily, too poor, too small to fight a 3 front war. Yes Russia would be facing forces from the west of their nation, from the south of their nation and from the east of their nation. Russia has never fought a multi front war and they do not have the manpower or the infrastructure to do so.

事實上，俄羅斯沒有成功的可能性。他們在軍事上太弱，經(jīng)濟(jì)太差，規(guī)模太小，無法進(jìn)行一場三線戰(zhàn)爭。是的，俄羅斯將面臨來自其國家西部、南部和東部的軍隊。俄羅斯從未打過多線戰(zhàn)爭，他們沒有足夠的人力和基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施來做到這一點(diǎn)。

The most likely outcome wound be that Russia is broken up into about 20 smaller countries. Not allowed to rebuild itself into what was Russia in the past. I suspect a fair amount of eastern Russia would revert to China.

最有可能的結(jié)果是俄羅斯分裂成大約20個較小的國家。不允許其重建成為過去的俄羅斯。我懷疑相當(dāng)多的東部俄羅斯將重新歸屬于中國。

Russia loves to wave around nuclear weapons as if it is the only nation with nuclear weapons, it isn’t. It wouldn’t fare well.

俄羅斯喜歡揮舞核武器，好像它是唯一擁有核武器的國家，但事實并非如此。它將會陷入困境。

俄羅斯 核潛艇 英國北約 第三次世界大戰(zhàn)

很贊 ( 4 )

QA問答：如果俄羅斯命令其63艘核潛艇全部靠近英國并同時開火，英國就會被摧毀。北約會冒第三次世界大戰(zhàn)的風(fēng)險，還是會退縮？

QA問答：如果俄羅斯命令其63艘核潛艇全部靠近英國并同時開火，英國就會被摧毀。北約會冒第三次世界大戰(zhàn)的風(fēng)險，還是會退縮？