烏克蘭再遭大規(guī)模導(dǎo)彈襲擊，德國(guó)網(wǎng)友：何時(shí)是個(gè)頭啊...
Russia launches 'massive missile attack' on Ukraine | DW News
譯文簡(jiǎn)介
周一，俄羅斯再次發(fā)動(dòng)大規(guī)模導(dǎo)彈襲擊，現(xiàn)場(chǎng)消息顯示，有人員傷亡。
正文翻譯
俄羅斯周一早些時(shí)候發(fā)動(dòng)了大規(guī)模的導(dǎo)彈襲擊，烏克蘭整個(gè)國(guó)家到處都是空襲警報(bào)，很多地方被擊中，現(xiàn)場(chǎng)消息顯示，有人員因此傷亡。
評(píng)論翻譯
很贊 ( 13 )
收藏
Man this is so sad and frightening. Now where's that guy that said that Russia doesn't have any missiles left in stock?
伙計(jì)，這個(gè)消息很讓人悲傷、恐懼。 現(xiàn)在，那個(gè)說俄羅斯沒有任何導(dǎo)彈庫(kù)存了的人在哪里？
He's looking for a new job
那家伙正在找新工作..
They have gotten new ones from North Korea
他們從朝鮮獲得了新的導(dǎo)彈供應(yīng)。
@linusfotograf wow north korea missiles is better than the russian missiles...it cant be intercept by the patriot systems and hitting targets everywhere in ukraine
哇，朝鮮導(dǎo)彈比俄羅斯導(dǎo)彈更好……愛國(guó)者系統(tǒng)都攔截不了，烏克蘭到處都有目標(biāo)被擊中。
@linusfotograf
"They have gotten new ones from North Korea" is your latest shameless explanation for the impotency of Western air defense systems, yeah?
“他們從朝鮮獲得了新的導(dǎo)彈”，這是你對(duì)西方防空系統(tǒng)無(wú)能的新的無(wú)恥解釋嗎？
@Titoscudd No, it was the explaination to the person saying that Russia was out of missiles.
@Titoscudd 不，我回應(yīng)的是那個(gè)人說俄羅斯沒有導(dǎo)彈了。
You told us Russia ran out of missiles last year..and it seems the patriot system saw nothing coming.
去年，（德國(guó)之聲）你告訴我們俄羅斯導(dǎo)彈已經(jīng)用光了的....而且，愛國(guó)者導(dǎo)彈防御系統(tǒng)似乎什么來襲目標(biāo)都沒有看到。
they didn't.....they bought these from NK
他們沒有了，他們從朝鮮買了這些導(dǎo)彈。
@linusfotograf Yes, we know, and US NATO actually created the conflict and fighting Russia using Ukraine soldiers with lots of so called US NATO modern advanced weapons, military instructors, mercenaries, etc. Unfortunately their plans to defeat Russia on the battlefield has failed miserably, and they're now confused because their air defense system is useless against Russian sophisticated shels.
@linusfotograf 是的，我們知道，是美國(guó)和北約實(shí)際上制造了這場(chǎng)沖突，并用烏克蘭士兵與很多所謂的美國(guó)/北約的現(xiàn)代高級(jí)武器、軍事教練、雇傭軍等與俄羅斯戰(zhàn)斗。不幸的是，他們?cè)趹?zhàn)場(chǎng)上擊敗俄羅斯的計(jì)劃失敗了?，F(xiàn)在，他們很困惑，因?yàn)樗麄兊姆揽障到y(tǒng)對(duì)俄羅斯先進(jìn)的炮彈不起作用了。
Where did russia get those missiles? Didnt they out of missiles?
俄羅斯哪里來的這些導(dǎo)彈？他們不是沒有導(dǎo)彈了嗎？
it makes me so sad and helpless
這讓我很難過、很無(wú)助。
Daily hearing this type of painful news. When this war will end
每天都聽到這種痛苦的消息。什么時(shí)候這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)結(jié)束啊？
where Russia leaves Ukraine
當(dāng)俄羅斯離開烏克蘭的時(shí)候。
Where ukraine surrenders.
當(dāng)烏克蘭投降的時(shí)候。
When the US and its allies allows Ukraine to surrender.
當(dāng)美國(guó)和它的盟友允許烏克蘭投降的時(shí)候。
Do German journalists not want to go to the Gaza Strip? Where civilians were killed ten times more in a couple of months. Or is it something else? Is Israel allowed?
德國(guó)記者是不想去加沙嗎？在幾個(gè)月時(shí)間里，被殺的平民（是俄烏戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的）十倍。還是有什么別的原因？（要）以色列允許？
580 kids died in Ukrane conflict in two years.
9000 in Gaza in three months.
I. e. kids in Gaza are getting killed at 125x that of Ukraine.
樓上，
兩年來，有580名兒童在烏克蘭沖突中死亡。
三個(gè)月內(nèi)，在加沙有9000名兒童死亡。
也就是，加沙被殺死的孩子數(shù)量是烏克蘭的125倍。
Zelensky admitted that Ukraine had no intention to honor the Minsk agreements. Who didn't want peace? Who advised against the 2022 peace talks in April?
Hint: someone visited Zelensky in Kiev at that time.
澤倫斯基承認(rèn)烏克蘭無(wú)意紀(jì)念明斯克協(xié)議。是誰(shuí)不想要和平？是誰(shuí)在（2022年）4月份建議拒絕和平談判？
提示下：當(dāng)時(shí)有人拜訪了基輔的澤連斯基。
Borris Johnson I think..
我想是鮑里斯.約翰遜。
【注：外媒有消息指，2022年戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)初期，俄烏在土耳其的談判接近達(dá)成協(xié)議，然后，英國(guó)首相約翰遜說服了澤連斯基?！?/b>
I don't remember if the guys from DW ever showed the results of the Ukrainian shelling of Donetsk and the people torn to pieces on the porch of the Luhansk regional administration after the Ukara Air Force raid? Most likely not, because the English-speaking public is only concerned about the news about the suffering of Kiev, but not Donbass...
我不記得德國(guó)之聲這些家伙是否曾經(jīng)展示過烏克蘭對(duì)頓涅茨克的炮擊，以及烏克蘭空襲之后在盧甘斯克地區(qū)走廊上被撕碎的人？很可能沒有，因?yàn)橹v英語(yǔ)的公眾，只關(guān)心基輔苦難的消息，但不關(guān)心頓巴斯的苦難...
And you seem to be only concerned about pro-Russian forces in the east
而（樓上）你，似乎只關(guān)注烏克蘭東邊那些親俄力量（的苦難）。
12-8-2022，Josep Borrell admits to ‘double standards’ towards Ukraine, Palestine, says that’s just international relations.
“We are often criticized for double standards. But international politics is to a large degree about applying double standards. We do not use the same criteria for all problems,” he said.
2022年12月8日，（歐盟外交政策專員）博雷利承認(rèn)對(duì)烏克蘭和巴勒斯坦的“雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)”，說這就是國(guó)際關(guān)系。
“我們經(jīng)常因雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)而受到批評(píng)。但是國(guó)際政治很大程度上就是有雙重標(biāo)準(zhǔn)的。我們沒有將相同的標(biāo)準(zhǔn)用于所有問題?！彼f。
More than 10,000 people have died in Donbass since Ukraine launched its “Anti-Terrorism Operation” in 2014
自2014年烏克蘭發(fā)起“反恐行動(dòng)”以來，頓巴斯已有10000多人死亡..
The people there were suffering because violent separatist terrorists overthrew the government and when Ukraine tried to establish order, Russia backed the separatist with heavy arms, and troops.
那里的人民受苦，是因?yàn)楸┝Φ姆蛛x主義恐怖分子推翻了政府，當(dāng)烏克蘭試圖建立秩序時(shí)，俄羅斯用強(qiáng)大的武器和軍隊(duì)在后面支持了分離主義者。
Fortunately "Russia has already lost the war" - Joe Biden April
不幸的是，“俄羅斯已經(jīng)輸?shù)袅藨?zhàn)爭(zhēng)”——拜登，4月份說的。
Don't warry.. They have western aur defense systems... I'm sure.... Zelansky will come out and say every missiels are shot down and no any damages are happening...???. Zelansky is a real actor..... But Ukrainian people can't understand this guy
不用擔(dān)心，他們有西方的防空系統(tǒng)...我敢肯定...澤連斯基會(huì)出來說所有導(dǎo)彈都被擊落了，沒有受到任何（導(dǎo)彈的）傷害....澤連斯基是一個(gè)真正的演員，但烏克蘭人民不理解這個(gè)家伙。
Where can we read something about farmers' protest in Germany?
我們?cè)谀睦锟梢宰x到有關(guān)德國(guó)農(nóng)民抗議的新聞？
I heard Putin was strategically defeated. Can somebody describe what this means
我聽說普京在戰(zhàn)略上被擊敗了。有人可以描述下這是什么意思嗎？
It means any real strategy they had at the beginning of the war has not worked. They started the war wanting to take over certain areas and quickly realized that wasn’t working. That’s why they’ve resorted to senseless missile attacks.
這意味著他們?cè)趹?zhàn)爭(zhēng)開始時(shí)的任何戰(zhàn)略都沒有起作用。他們開啟戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，希望“接管”某些領(lǐng)域，然后很快意識(shí)到行不通。這就是為什么他們會(huì)進(jìn)行這樣無(wú)意義的導(dǎo)彈攻擊的原因。
So it looks the same as when NATO bombed Yugoslavia.
因此，這看起來與北約轟炸南斯拉夫時(shí)一樣。
This is rediculous.
這是荒謬的。
Ukraine needs and deserves all support
If cost is an issue, never forget that the cost of Putin winning this war would be far more expensive than any help given.
Putin winning anything with this war means he would try again + China would also consider invading Taiwan.
This obviously has huge implications for world peace.
烏克蘭需要并且應(yīng)該得到所有的支持。
如果成本是問題的話，那么，永遠(yuǎn)不要忘記，普京贏得這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)的成本將比任何（給予烏克蘭的）幫助要昂貴得多。
普京在這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中贏得的任何東西，都意味著他會(huì)再次嘗試...而且中國(guó)也會(huì)考慮X臺(tái)灣（地區(qū)）。
顯然，這對(duì)世界和平具有巨大的影響。
Russia has the right to defend itself, just like israel. Ukraine has luck that russias special operation is more human than Israels special operation
就像以色列一樣，俄羅斯有權(quán)自衛(wèi)。烏克蘭很幸運(yùn)，俄羅斯的特殊行動(dòng)比以色列的特殊行動(dòng)更人性。
Russia invaded, just like Israel, but Israel at least had some excuse(albeit wildly out of proportion)
Russia isn't "defending itself" when they invaded another country for no remotely justifiable reason. Ukraine was defending itself.
俄羅斯入侵，就像以色列一樣，但以色列至少還有一些借口（盡管借口不充分）。
而俄羅斯，當(dāng)他們沒有絲毫正當(dāng)?shù)睦碛扇肭至硪粋€(gè)國(guó)家時(shí)，俄羅斯并不是在“自衛(wèi)”。烏克蘭才是自衛(wèi)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
@DoubleMonoLR Russia had excuse, its called national security
@doublemonolr 俄羅斯有借口，（借口）是國(guó)家安全。
I don’t think it’s possible for Ukraine to win this war unless other countries or NATO join in.
我認(rèn)為除非其他國(guó)家或者北約加入（戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)），否則烏克蘭不可能贏得這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)。
That’s why it was always futile…NATO won’t go up against Russia…it knows it will lose or end in mutually assured destruction (nuclear war)
這就是為什么（支持烏克蘭）沒有用...北約不會(huì)起來對(duì)抗俄羅斯...它知道它會(huì)輸，或者最終以相互毀滅結(jié)束（核戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)）。
@God_help_us NATO wouldn't lose, but nobody in NATO wants any direct war with Russia, especially Poland and Baltic States don't want it. I really hope they will just abandon Ukraine and give aid only to those countries that are actually NATO members. Ukraine is not in NATO and its membership should NEVER be even discussed. Ukraine simply woke up too late to join NATO and it chose wrong allies for the last 30 years.
@god_help_us 北約不會(huì)輸，但是北約中沒有哪個(gè)國(guó)家希望與俄羅斯進(jìn)行任何直接的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)，尤其是波蘭和波羅的海國(guó)家不會(huì)想要。我真的希望他們放棄烏克蘭，只向?qū)嶋H上已經(jīng)是北約成員的國(guó)家提供援助。烏克蘭不在北約之中，甚至不應(yīng)該討論它的成員資格。烏克蘭就是覺醒太晚了，無(wú)法加入北約了，在過去的30年里，它選擇了錯(cuò)誤的盟友。
To win as underdog takes time, 2 years of war is nothing look at Afganistan, Vietnam etc...
I dont think Russia can sustain a war economy for 20 years.
作為弱的一方要想贏是需要時(shí)間的，2年的戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)算不了啥，看看阿富汗、越南...
我不認(rèn)為俄羅斯可以維持戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)經(jīng)濟(jì)20年時(shí)間。
@wokeaf1337 Russia is not on a war economy. Ukraine is.
@Wokeaf1337俄羅斯可不是戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)經(jīng)濟(jì)，烏克蘭才是。
@ignacio4159 Russia has a war economy, their military production skyrocketed since 2022.
@Ignacio4159 俄羅斯是戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)經(jīng)濟(jì)，其軍事生產(chǎn)自2022年以來猛增。
@kacperzimowski4626 NATO wouldn't lose, huh? So, who is NATO? It certainly isn't you, your family, or your friends. You would all lose. We would all lose. If NATO is a bunch of rich elitist politicians etc... that have bunkers they would survive, maybe. You will not.
北約不會(huì)輸，真的嗎？那么，誰(shuí)是北約？ 當(dāng)然不是你，你的家人或你的朋友。你們都會(huì)輸。我們也都會(huì)輸。 如果北約是一群富有的精英政治家等....有掩體的人，他們可能能夠生存下來，但你不會(huì)。
What western high tech air defense systems doing
西方高科技的防空系統(tǒng)在做什么？
Ukraine’s top negotiator, Davyd Arakhamia: Russia was “prepared to end the war if we agreed to... neutrality, and committed that we would not join NATO.”
But the US and UK stood in the way.
烏克蘭的首席談判代表戴維德：如果我們同意……中立，并承諾我們不會(huì)加入北約，俄羅斯準(zhǔn)備結(jié)束戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)?！?br /> 但是美國(guó)和英國(guó)阻止了（這份和平協(xié)定）。
Russia clearly stated that Ukraine joining nato was a red line (November 2021). The Russians openly stated: if nothing changes, we will be forced to act in order to defend our national security. Enhancing the national security of one country at the expense of another is unacceptable. The Russians have legitimate security concerns.
Unfortunately this concern was never taken seriously. War is the ultimate failure of diplomacy.
2021年11月，俄羅斯明確表示，烏克蘭加入北約是一條紅線。俄羅斯人公開說：如果事情沒有任何改變的話，我們將被迫采取行動(dòng)，以捍衛(wèi)我們的國(guó)家安全。 一個(gè)國(guó)家的國(guó)家安全以犧牲另一個(gè)國(guó)家為代價(jià)是不可接受的。俄羅斯人有合理的安全擔(dān)憂。
不幸的是，這種擔(dān)憂從未受到重視。戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)（這個(gè)結(jié)果）是外交的終極失敗。
Is this old news from last week or this is a new tragedy
這是上周的舊新聞，還是說這是一個(gè)新的悲??？
Russia has right to defend itself from evil NATO
俄羅斯有權(quán)保衛(wèi)自己免受邪惡北約的傷害。
The war in Ukraine cannot be solved militarily by both sides. Peace talk is needed before the country is completely destroyed. Ukraine might have to give up its goal of joining NATO, and declare itself neutral and nonaligned.
烏克蘭戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)不可能由雙方軍事解決的。在這個(gè)國(guó)家被徹底摧毀之前，需要和平對(duì)話。烏克蘭可能不得不放棄加入北約的目標(biāo)，并宣布自己中立和不結(jié)盟。
- "before the country is completely destroyed"... that sounds to me exactly like Russia can solve this militarily ?
——“在這個(gè)國(guó)家被徹底摧毀之前”....在我聽來，這不就像是說俄羅斯能夠用軍事解決這個(gè)問題嗎？
@sebastianforbes1 Yes, he can, but he doesn’t want to yet.
There are many reasons at both the economic and political levels.
是的，俄羅斯（能），但他還不想這么樣。
經(jīng)濟(jì)和政治層面上有很多的原因（使得俄羅斯不想這樣做）。
I thought Zelensky shot down all of Russian missiles
我還以為澤倫斯基擊落了所有俄羅斯導(dǎo)彈呢。
Russia has right to defend himself
俄羅斯有權(quán)自衛(wèi)。
Nobody attacked Russia.
沒有人襲擊俄羅斯。
russia invaded Ukraine. It is not defending itself. Ukraine did not attack russia in any way whatsoever before then.
俄羅斯入侵了烏克蘭，這不是自衛(wèi)。烏克蘭在（戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)）之前沒有以任何方式攻擊俄羅斯。
????????? Pray Ukraine get support asap
祈禱烏克蘭能夠盡快獲得支持！
Putin should send christmas gifts to all western Europe.
普京應(yīng)該把圣誕節(jié)禮物送給所有西歐國(guó)家。
I can't remember how long this war has been going on for, the President is taking positive action to achieve his obxtives.
He wants results.
我不記得這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)已經(jīng)進(jìn)行了多長(zhǎng)時(shí)間了，總統(tǒng)正在采取積極行動(dòng)來實(shí)現(xiàn)他的目標(biāo)。
他想要結(jié)果。
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
North Korea ballistics missiles, big business, they have not get this order for a long time, hundreds being shipped to Russia
朝鮮的彈道導(dǎo)彈，大買賣啊，他們已經(jīng)很久沒有這樣的訂單了....數(shù)百導(dǎo)彈被運(yùn)往俄羅斯....
incredible
讓人難以置信！
Ukraine has to treat their cities the same way
烏克蘭不得不以同樣的方式對(duì)待（俄羅斯的）城市。
Didn't Ukraine has a 200% of interception rate?
烏克蘭不是攔截率200％的嗎？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Zelensky is very adamant. Ukraine got ruined due to him
澤連斯基非常堅(jiān)定。烏克蘭因他而毀了....
I dont think the Nato countries leaders will want to go there now for their photo. Zelenski where are you?
我不認(rèn)為北約國(guó)家領(lǐng)導(dǎo)人現(xiàn)在想去那里拍照。澤連斯基，你在哪里？
Same like Iraq war
就像伊拉克戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)一樣。
Putin is in serious stage of cancer?????? Putin is running out of missiles ???
普京癌癥晚期...（笑）
普京的導(dǎo)彈用完了...（笑）
【注：這是德國(guó)之聲上面?zhèn)鞑サ南?。?/b>
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
seems patriot needs more protection
似乎愛國(guó)者系統(tǒng)需要更多的保護(hù)。
shame on the Ukrainian government and shame on nato for starting this war
為烏克蘭政府感到羞恥，并為北約開始這場(chǎng)戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)感到羞恥。
Don't worry Ukraine has plenty of air defenses that can shoot down All missiles says their President..
別擔(dān)心，烏克蘭總統(tǒng)說了，烏克蘭有很多防空系統(tǒng)，能夠擊落所有的導(dǎo)彈。
The UK should continue arming and financing its colonial project in Kyiv.
英國(guó)應(yīng)該繼續(xù)武裝（烏克蘭），并繼續(xù)為在基輔的殖民項(xiàng)目提供資金。
Why is international support for Ukraine faltering at this most critical time in the war?
為什么在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)最關(guān)鍵的時(shí)刻，國(guó)際社會(huì)對(duì)烏克蘭的支持遲疑了？
because Ukraine is its own country and other countries have their own problems to look after
因?yàn)闉蹩颂m是（烏克蘭人）自己的國(guó)家，而其他國(guó)家有自己的問題要應(yīng)對(duì)。
because it's clear they lost
因?yàn)楹苊黠@他們輸了。
Because everyone who is not a radical understands Ukraine has already lost.
因?yàn)橹灰皇菢O端分子，都明白烏克蘭已經(jīng)輸了。
Donetsk is under bombing 9 years.
Kiev is under bombing only 2 years.
頓涅茨克被轟炸了9年。
基輔才被轟炸2年。
It will probably take a while, but in the end.....one has to pay for one's actions.
可能需要一段時(shí)間才能到來，但最終....有人需要為自己的行為付出代價(jià)。
You poked the bear while hibernating, now deal with it
你在熊冬眠的時(shí)候戳醒它，現(xiàn)在就得應(yīng)對(duì)它...
Should have negotiated peace in April 2022. Such a wasted opportunity.
應(yīng)該在2022年4月談判和平的。浪費(fèi)了一個(gè)多好的機(jī)會(huì)啊！
Is Ukraine being attacked by Russia because of the USA/nato expansion nearby Russia?
烏克蘭是否是因?yàn)槊绹?guó)/北約在俄羅斯附近的擴(kuò)張，而受到俄羅斯襲擊的？
there’s multiple reasons as to why Ukraine are being invaded, 1. Because of NATO 2. Theres Russian population there that are being oppressed
烏克蘭被入侵有很多原因：
1、由于北約
2、那里的俄羅斯族人被壓迫
If you don't like what Russia is doing try to stop them
如果你不喜歡俄羅斯做的事情，那就請(qǐng)?jiān)囍柚顾麄?..