為什么英國和中國的軍事實力比美國弱？是因為質(zhì)量不夠還是數(shù)量不夠？

Peter Kaye
Nope it’s your lack of knowledge, seems like your one of the brainwashed yanks that thinks the USA is supreme, BUT, for your information, it’s all just a dream, the USA with SIX other countries helping them couldn’t even beat a tiny country like Vietnam, AND EVEN AFTER TWENTY YEARS, still had their arses kicked by a bunch of goat herders in Afghanistan. Ran like a bunch of sissies, I would suggest the USA are one of the weakest military on the planet, yes you have a lot of equipment but most of it is outdated and falling apart, Uk, military is very well trained an tough, as they proved in various military games against the US, and China? Far FAR to modern for the US, to even touch them, it’s doesn’t matter how good you THINK your military is, words and fantasy do NOT win wars.

不對，這是你的無知?？雌饋砟闶悄切┍幌茨X的人之一，認為美國至高無上，但是，你參考一下，這一切只是一個夢想。美國與其他六個國家一起，甚至無法擊敗像越南這樣的小國。以至于在二十年后，他們?nèi)匀槐话⒏缓沟囊蝗耗裂蛉舜虻寐浠魉?。像一群膽小鬼一樣逃跑。我會說美國是地球上最弱的軍事力量之一，是的，你們有很多裝備，但其中大部分已經(jīng)過時并且沒啥大威力。英國的軍隊接受了很好的訓(xùn)練，非常強悍，正如他們在與美國進行的各種軍事比賽中證明的那樣。至于中國？對于美國來說，他們比之前現(xiàn)代太多了，根本無法對抗。你認為你的軍隊有多強大并不重要，YY和幻想并不能贏得戰(zhàn)爭。

Robert Vannrox
Related
Is the United States military better than the Chinese?
From 1950 until 1953, this question was answered.
When the “Korean War” broke out, the North pretty much seized most of Korea, and then the United States led Allied forces entered the conflict.
The Allied forces won battle after battle, pushing the Northern forces back, and back, and back. It was one victory after the other. The American led forces pushed the North Korean forces up to the Chinese border.
When the Allied forces, led by the United States, crossed into China, and started bombing China… China got involved.
From the moment that China got involved, the tide of the war was reversed. And after battle after battle, the Chinese won. The month by month situation plainly shows this onslaught of non-stop Chinese victories against the United States.
The United States sued for peace, and agreed to leave. They left in a (classic) rout. With military installations abandoned in haste, and military depots bombed remotely via Naval bombardment.
All in all, at that time, the United States was at the height of power, and global influence, and it lost to China. Not just “l(fā)ost”, but had to retreat in a most undignified manner. The United States suffered a defeat that was spectacular.
Is the United States military better than the PLA?
No one knows.
We can only use history as a guide.
And in doing so, we clearly see that the Chinese PLA fought the United States and won. It is up to the reader to determine, for themselves if Chinese PLA forces are weaker today than in 1950, and whether the American military is stronger today than in 1950.
What was the “Korean War” like?

相關(guān)討論
美國軍隊比中國軍隊更強嗎？
從1950年到1953年，這個問題得到了回答。
當(dāng)“朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭”爆發(fā)時，原朝鮮軍隊幾乎占領(lǐng)了朝鮮的大部分地區(qū)，然后美國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的聯(lián)軍介入沖突。
聯(lián)軍贏得了一場又一場的戰(zhàn)斗，將北方軍隊打回去，一直打回去。這是一場接一場的勝利。美國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的軍隊把朝鮮軍隊打到了中國邊境。
當(dāng)由美國領(lǐng)導(dǎo)的聯(lián)軍越過中國邊境，開始轟炸中國時... 中國介入了。
從中國介入的那一刻起，戰(zhàn)爭的天平發(fā)生了逆轉(zhuǎn)。在一場又一場的戰(zhàn)斗之后，中國取得了勝利。后來的情況清楚地顯示了這場對美國不斷取得的中國勝利的沖擊。
美國請求和平，并同意撤退。他們在一場（經(jīng)典的）潰敗中離開。軍事設(shè)施被匆忙棄置，其軍火庫通過海軍炮擊遠程轟炸來毀掉。
總的來說，那個時候，美國處于權(quán)力和全球影響的巔峰，但卻輸給了中國。不僅是“輸”，而且是以最不體面的方式撤退。美國遭受了一場壯觀的失敗。
美國軍隊是否比解放軍更強大？
沒有人知道。
我們只能以歷史為指南。
通過這樣做，我們清楚地看到中國解放軍與美國作戰(zhàn)并取得了勝利。由讀者自行判斷，中國解放軍是否比1950年弱，以及美國軍隊是否比1950年更強大。
看看“朝鮮戰(zhàn)爭”是什么樣的？

Geoffrey Thorndyke
You do realise that there are about a dozen US States that are bigger than the United Kingdom? (it is actually one fortieth the area of the USA), and there are about 250 million more Americans than Britons?, and the US GDP is 10 times the size of the UK?
USA and China are the third and fourth largest Countries by area, the UK is the 78th !
I wonder if that could have anything to do with it ?.

你知道有大約十幾個美國州比英國大嗎？（實際上，英國的面積是美國的四十分之一），而且美國人口比英國多大約2.5億人？而且美國的GDP是英國的十倍？
美國和中國是面積第三和第四大的國家，而英國排名第78！
我想這可能與此有關(guān)吧？

Andy Durden
Related
Will China overtake the US militarily?
Not for a long long time.
In pretty much every single area of military development the US maintains large superiority.
Better navy, better army, better airforce.
What China will be able to do is to build strategic antishipping missile defences to created a denial zone a few thousands of Km from China mainland.
Chinese anti ship missiles
are designed to deter foreign navies from, not only reaching Chinese territorial waters but even other parts of the seas and oceans around China

相關(guān)討論
中國會在軍事上超過美國嗎？
很長一段時間內(nèi)都不會。
在幾乎每個軍事發(fā)展領(lǐng)域，美國都保持著巨大的優(yōu)勢。
更強大的海軍，更強大的陸軍，更強大的空軍。
中國將能夠建立戰(zhàn)略性的反艦導(dǎo)彈防御系統(tǒng)，形成一個距離中國大陸數(shù)千公里的防御區(qū)。
中國的反艦導(dǎo)彈
旨在威懾外國海軍，不僅阻止它們進入中國領(lǐng)海，甚至是中國周圍的其他海域。

Ernest W. Adams
Related
Can China really take on the USA militarily?
That depends on what it's trying to do. China cannot fight and win a blue water sea war with the United States, at least with conventional weapons. Its navy is not strong enough. It can definitely defend mainland China against invasion, and the USA would never try it.
The real question at present is what the USA would do if China mounted an amphibious assault on Taiwan. If the US really commits to Taiwan's defense, the assault would fail—but is the US willing to do that?

相關(guān)討論
中國在軍事上真的能與美國匹敵嗎？
這取決于它試圖做什么。中國至少用傳統(tǒng)武器無法在海戰(zhàn)中與美國抗衡并取勝。它的海軍實力不夠強大。但它絕對可以防御中國大陸免受入侵，而美國也絕不會嘗試這樣做。
當(dāng)前真正的問題是，如果中國對臺灣發(fā)動兩棲進攻，美國會采取什么行動。如果美國真的致力于捍衛(wèi)臺灣，那么進攻將會失敗，但美國是否愿意這樣做呢？
原創(chuàng)翻譯：龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請注明出處

Man With A Plan
Its due to the fallout from ww1 and ww2. Without the world wars of the 20th century the US could not have attained its peak power circa 1950's - 60's and it could not have maintained its empire throughout the cold war and into the modern era. Similarly China was weakened by events but also ultimately gained freedom from the influence of the old imperial powers including the UK. The UK didn't really gain anything from events, they only lost. All things being equal and overtime China will quite rightly usurp the US at the top. In time India will also do likewise. This is only natural in a free market system as these are the most populous nations.

這是由于一戰(zhàn)和二戰(zhàn)導(dǎo)致的后果。如果沒有20世紀的世界大戰(zhàn)，美國就無法在1950年代和60年代左右達到其巔峰實力，也無法在冷戰(zhàn)時期一直保持其帝國地位，直至進入現(xiàn)代社會。同樣，中國也因為二戰(zhàn)事件而削弱，但最終擺脫了包括英國在內(nèi)的舊帝國勢力的影響，獲得了自由。英國在這些事件中實際上并沒有得到什么，他們只是失去了。一切平等，隨著時間的推移，中國將正當(dāng)?shù)厝〈绹牡匚?。印度最終也會做同樣的事情。在自由市場體系中，這只是最人口眾多的國家自然而然的發(fā)展。