在光輝發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)交付延誤的情況下,HAL俄羅斯負(fù)責(zé)人為蘇霍伊公司尋找俄羅斯發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)
Amidst Tejas Engine Delivery Delays, HAL Chief in Russia Scouts for Russian engines for Sukhoi譯文簡(jiǎn)介
由于通用拒絕為光輝戰(zhàn)機(jī)繼續(xù)生產(chǎn)老式發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),光輝MK1還未大量生產(chǎn)之前即面臨停產(chǎn)。印度斯坦航空公司開始尋求俄羅斯發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)以繼續(xù)該項(xiàng)目。
正文翻譯
由于通用拒絕為光輝戰(zhàn)機(jī)繼續(xù)生產(chǎn)老式發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),光輝MK1還未大量生產(chǎn)之前即面臨停產(chǎn)。印度斯坦航空公司開始尋求俄羅斯發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)以繼續(xù)該項(xiàng)目。
評(píng)論翻譯
很贊 ( 8 )
收藏
Save Bangladeshi Hindus...
拯救孟加拉國(guó)的印度教徒...
@HameedBaloch-z1y
# INDIA STOP ISSUING MEDICAL VESA FOR BANGLADESHIS Musli....
印度停止為孟加拉國(guó)穆斯林發(fā)放醫(yī)療簽證。
Engine ka naam hi F404 hai milega kaise. 404 Not found.
發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的名字就是F404,怎么能找到呢?404 找不到。
Cow kola is engine
牛逼可以當(dāng)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。
sahi hai guru
沒錯(cuò),師傅。
??? ??? ??? ?? ?????????? ?? ???? ???? ??? ?
????? ?? ???? ????? ?? ?????? ???? ????? ?? ?? ?? ????? ?? ????? ?? ??? ?? ?????? ?
兄弟,我們什么時(shí)候在引擎上能實(shí)現(xiàn)自給自足?
中國(guó)按照自己的方式制造了強(qiáng)大的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),而我們卻依賴別人和援助。
Even China had to develop their engines through reverse engineering....
甚至中國(guó)也不得不通過逆向工程開發(fā)他們的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)……
Misleading news... You have before also given such news in hurry... Take rest drink water and relax... Don't be in hurry.... And no need to make news in every topic... Not good, you are professor so it's not good to make wrong news
誤導(dǎo)性的新聞……你之前也曾匆忙發(fā)布過這樣的新聞……休息一下,喝點(diǎn)水,放松一下……不要著急……不必在每個(gè)話題上都做新聞……不好,你是教授,發(fā)布錯(cuò)誤的新聞不好。
???? AL31 ???? ?? ??? ?? ??? ???? ???? ????? ?? ???? ??? ????? ????? ??? ?????? ????? ?????? ???? ?? ?????? ?? ???? ???? ?? ??? ???? ???? ?? ????????? ????? ?? ???? ??? ???? ????? ???? ??? ?? ???????? ?? ????? ????? ????? ?? ????? ?? ???? ?? ??? ??? ??? ?? ?? AL31 ???? ?? ???? ???? ???? ????? ??? ????? ?? ????? ?? ???
不,基于AL31發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),印度和俄羅斯將共同研究開發(fā)新型小型發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),因?yàn)榧夹g(shù)已經(jīng)有了基礎(chǔ),因此根據(jù)這個(gè)基礎(chǔ)來制造適合“光輝”的新發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)不會(huì)花費(fèi)太多時(shí)間。起初我也很困惑,但仔細(xì)閱讀新聞后才明白這不是AL31,而是它的小型復(fù)制品,做了一些改進(jìn)和調(diào)整。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Thanks for clarifying @navi_luna28
感謝你澄清
Bharat ko time tested trustworthy friend Russia ke sath collaborate Karna chahiye for Su-57,SU-35,Mig-35 aur ja Russia se hi buy karne chahiye fighter jets. Jaise pehle SU-30 Bharat mein manufacture huye aisay hi SU-57 bhi Bharat mein manufacture Karne chahiye. 1 Squadron Mig-31 ki bhi buy karni chahiye. Minimum 6 TU-160 bombers bhi buy karne chahiye.
印度應(yīng)該與經(jīng)過時(shí)間考驗(yàn)的可信朋友俄羅斯合作,購(gòu)買蘇-57、蘇-35、米格-35等戰(zhàn)斗機(jī),像之前在印度生產(chǎn)蘇-30一樣,也應(yīng)該在印度生產(chǎn)蘇-57。還應(yīng)該購(gòu)買1個(gè)中隊(duì)的米格-31,并至少購(gòu)買6架圖-160戰(zhàn)略轟炸機(jī)。
This guy needs to watch defence upxe channels and need to do some serious homework .....sounds like some naive guy is speaking and this channel is meant to educate upsc aspirants ..god bless
這個(gè)人需要去看一些軍事更新頻道,做一些認(rèn)真的功課……聽起來像是一個(gè)天真的人在說話,這個(gè)頻道本應(yīng)該是為UPSC考生提供教育的……愿上帝保佑。
Save Bangladeshi Hindu
拯救孟加拉國(guó)的印度教徒
Jet engine chopper ko kaisa hota bahi.?
噴氣發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)直升機(jī)是怎樣的,兄弟?
I dont think it can be used in single engine. Single engine has to be more reliable. Russian engine is notorious known for crash. This news is misleading.
我認(rèn)為它不能用于單引擎飛機(jī)。單引擎必須更加可靠。俄羅斯的引擎因故障而臭名昭著。這則新聞是誤導(dǎo)性的。
Exactly , even news on rupees performing well as currency proved to be wrong as cnbc18 reported today , rupee is the second worst performing economy in Asia in november
沒錯(cuò),甚至關(guān)于印度盧比表現(xiàn)良好的新聞也被證明是錯(cuò)誤的,正如CNBC18今天報(bào)道的,盧比是11月亞洲表現(xiàn)最差的第二大貨幣。
You have no credibility to talk about engines or HAL
你沒有資格談?wù)摪l(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)或印度航空航天局。
Bharat ki airforce mein definitely west ke kafi mole Hoge Jin ke nakhre Nahi khatam hote, requirements ke name upar Russian jets ko reject karte rehte hai, intentionally delay karte hai so that western jets ko buy karne ki ground tyar ki jaye. Aur agar Bharat ne ek baar unreliable western countries se jets buy kar ley toh Bharat ki Bullying, Exploitation ke doors open jo jayege, war emergency ke time supplies restrict hogi ja extra pay karege, west ke trap mein fus jayege,fir west ki further illegitimate demands se agree karege,Bharat ki Sovereignty khatam Hogi, usage ki terms and conditions hogi, apne weapon integration ka scope kum Hoga. Bharat ki government abb west ke pressure mein decisions Na ley. Bharat Common sense, Wisdom use Kare. Bharat abb intelligently, independently decisions ley aur Russia se every kind ke fighter jets buy kare
印度空軍中肯定會(huì)有很多西方國(guó)家的傲慢,他們總是以需求為名拒絕俄羅斯的戰(zhàn)斗機(jī),故意拖延時(shí)間,為了給購(gòu)買西方戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)創(chuàng)造條件。
如果印度一旦從不可靠的西方國(guó)家購(gòu)買戰(zhàn)斗機(jī),那將打開印度被欺凌、被剝削的大門,戰(zhàn)時(shí)緊急情況下供應(yīng)會(huì)受到限制,或需要額外支付費(fèi)用,陷入西方的陷阱中,接著會(huì)同意西方進(jìn)一步不合法的要求,印度的主權(quán)會(huì)被削弱,使用條款和條件也會(huì)有很多限制,武器集成的空間會(huì)減少。
印度政府現(xiàn)在應(yīng)該避免在西方的壓力下做決策。印度應(yīng)運(yùn)用常識(shí)和智慧,獨(dú)立、理智地做出決策,購(gòu)買俄羅斯的所有類型的戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)。
Fighter jets ke engines ke liye Bharat ko time tested trustworthy friend Russia ke Sath hi collaborate Karna chahiye,Russia se hi engines buy karne chahiye. america ke sath Sabi defense deals including engines ko Bharat immediately Cancel kar dey. Bharat ko time tested trustworthy friend Russia ke sath collaborate Karna chahiye for Su-57,SU-35,Mig-35 aur ja Russia se hi buy karne chahiye fighter jets. Jaise pehle SU-30 Bharat mein manufacture huye aisay hi SU-57 bhi Bharat mein manufacture Karne chahiye. 1 Squadron Mig-31 ki bhi buy karni chahiye. Minimum 6 TU-160 bombers bhi buy karne chahiye.
對(duì)于戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),印度應(yīng)該僅與其經(jīng)過時(shí)間考驗(yàn)、值得信賴的朋友——俄羅斯合作,并從俄羅斯購(gòu)買發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。印度應(yīng)該立即取消所有與美國(guó)的防務(wù)協(xié)議,包括發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)相關(guān)的協(xié)議。印度應(yīng)該與俄羅斯合作,采購(gòu)蘇-57、蘇-35、米格-35戰(zhàn)斗機(jī),并從俄羅斯購(gòu)買這些戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)。就像蘇-30曾在印度制造一樣,蘇-57也應(yīng)該在印度制造。印度還應(yīng)該購(gòu)買一支米格-31中隊(duì),并至少采購(gòu)六架圖-160戰(zhàn)略轟炸機(jī)。
India also needs to focus on developing engine technology. I think India should start developing its own engines to power future fighter jets. If India can develop its own fighter jets then why not engines too.
印度還需要專注于開發(fā)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)技術(shù)。我認(rèn)為印度應(yīng)該開始開發(fā)自己的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),以為未來的戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)提供動(dòng)力。如果印度能夠開發(fā)自己的戰(zhàn)斗機(jī),那為什么不能開發(fā)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)呢?
I completely agree. With advancements in AI and additive manufacturing, India should focus on developing its own engines. And this will not only make India self-reliant but also help the country in the long run in defense matters.
我完全同意。隨著人工智能和增材制造技術(shù)的發(fā)展,印度應(yīng)該專注于開發(fā)自己的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。這不僅能使印度實(shí)現(xiàn)自給自足,還將有助于國(guó)家在長(zhǎng)期的國(guó)防事務(wù)中取得進(jìn)展。
bhai Russian engine us level ke nhi hai lekin HMM China ne even Russian engine ke reverse karke apne Ws series bna diye France hmara most trustworthy ally hai West main. France ne even 1980 America ke khilaf jakr Mirage 2000 diye the jab Pakistan ko F-16 mile the. Baki France se collaboration ho sakti hai waise bhi ab 5th generation level ka Engine chahiye abhi Russia bhi use bna nhi paya Su-57 tabhi pure tarike se stealth nhi
兄弟,俄羅斯的引擎還沒達(dá)到那個(gè)水平,不過中國(guó)通過逆向工程制造了自己的WS系列發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。法國(guó)是我們?cè)谖鞣降淖羁尚刨嚨拿擞?,法?guó)甚至在1980年時(shí)為我們提供了“幻影2000”,當(dāng)時(shí)巴基斯坦拿到了F-16。
所以法國(guó)的合作是可以的,畢竟現(xiàn)在我們需要的是第五代的引擎,而俄羅斯至今也沒有完全弄好蘇-57的隱身技術(shù)。
@Hobbit_2024 Bharat ke Liye Russia direct fight Karne ke Liye aya tha against america, britain. But france Nahi aya.
Russia 1963 se Bharat ko fighter jets dey reha hai,jub ke france se 1985 mein milay.
Aur Bharat ki airforce mein primarily Russian fighter jets hai.
Russia ne 6 Times Veto Kiya in favour of Bharat. But france ne kabhi Veto Nahi Kiya in favour of Bharat.
france ko trustworthy kehna murakhta hai. france ek Lo0tera desh hai plus unreliable Bully western countries ka member hai,jub emergency ayegi toh france ne vaise hi Karna hai jaise western countries ne Karna hai.
Weapons mein Jitni technology transfer, joint manufacturing, license production Russia ne Bharat ko kari hai utni Sabi western countries ne mil kar bhi Nahi Kari.
Russia hi Bharat ka trustworthy time tested friend.
5th generation fighter jets france ke paas Nahi hai.
SU-57 much better hai than american fighter jets. Russia ke fighter jets cheap and effective hai. Aur west ke sath engines,fighter jets mein collaborate Kar Kya milega? War emergency ke time bullying, exploitation, supplies restrictions, increased prices,many terms and conditions.
為了印度,俄羅斯曾直接與美國(guó)、英國(guó)對(duì)抗,但法國(guó)并沒有出面。
自1963年以來,俄羅斯一直向印度提供戰(zhàn)斗機(jī),而法國(guó)直到1985年才開始提供。
而印度空軍的主要戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)就是俄羅斯制造的。
俄羅斯已經(jīng)為印度在聯(lián)合國(guó)安理會(huì)六次行使否決權(quán),而法國(guó)從未為印度行使過否決權(quán)。
說法國(guó)可信賴簡(jiǎn)直是愚蠢的,法國(guó)是一個(gè)不可信賴的國(guó)家,而且是西方國(guó)家中的一個(gè)惡霸成員,在緊急情況下,法國(guó)也會(huì)像西方國(guó)家一樣行事。
俄羅斯在武器技術(shù)轉(zhuǎn)讓、聯(lián)合生產(chǎn)和許可生產(chǎn)方面給了印度很多幫助,西方國(guó)家聯(lián)合起來也無法做到這一點(diǎn)。
俄羅斯才是印度的可信賴的、經(jīng)過時(shí)間考驗(yàn)的朋友。
法國(guó)沒有第五代戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)。
蘇-57比美國(guó)的戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)要好得多。俄羅斯的戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)便宜且有效。與西方國(guó)家合作開發(fā)引擎和戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)能得到什么?戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)緊急情況下,西方國(guó)家的欺凌、剝削、供應(yīng)限制、價(jià)格上漲、更多條款和條件。
It will create supply chain for old junk engine for small country like aarmania
這將為像亞美尼亞這樣的國(guó)家創(chuàng)造供應(yīng)鏈,用于老舊的垃圾引擎。
@nishantkumar2405 Kaveri ready ho Chuka haii abb 3,3.5 Saal ka testing hoga firr Pura service Mai aiya Ga
Kaveri引擎已經(jīng)準(zhǔn)備好了,現(xiàn)在將進(jìn)行3到3.5年的測(cè)試,之后將全面投入使用。
Russia se al-41 and al-51 dono engine ki tot le Leni chahia
應(yīng)該從俄羅斯購(gòu)買AL-41和AL-51兩款發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。
Bharatko AeroEngien banane ho to DRDO Hal Isro BROHOMOSH aero speash ko sath Kam karna hoga
如果印度要制造航空發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),必須與DRDO、HAL、ISRO以及Brahmos Aerospace等單位合作。
Welcome
歡迎。
??? ????? ???? ???? ??? ??? ?? ???? ?? ???? ???? ????? ???? ???? 3000-3500 ???? ?? ???? ???? ??? ??????? ???? 10000 ????? ?? ?????? ???? ???
沒有其他辦法了。可能必須選擇俄羅斯的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。俄羅斯的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)壽命是3000到3500小時(shí),而美國(guó)的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)壽命超過10000小時(shí)。
Should take 700plus su 75. 57 35 combined
應(yīng)該采購(gòu)700多架SU-75、SU-57和SU-35的組合。
Bharat ko Unreliable Bully western countries ke sath bilkul bhi collaborate Nahi karna chahiye. west se weapons buy Karne ka matlab hai apni Sovereignty ko sell Karna,apne pairo upar khud app kulhari marna,apni further exploitation ke doors open Karna, emergency mein dokha khana.
印度絕對(duì)不應(yīng)該與那些不可靠、霸凌的西方國(guó)家合作。從西方購(gòu)買武器意味著出賣自己的主權(quán),意味著自掘墳?zāi)?,為進(jìn)一步的剝削打開大門,最終在緊急時(shí)刻被背叛。
I feel in future india will close the gap between US engine optimization just like past war when russia given weapons to India at time of war.
我覺得未來印度將縮小與美國(guó)在發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)優(yōu)化方面的差距,就像過去俄羅斯在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)時(shí)向印度提供武器一樣。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Correct your self RD33 MK OSA FOR TEJUSKY
請(qǐng)更正一下,RD33 MK是為光輝戰(zhàn)機(jī)設(shè)計(jì)的。
Gobar cola
糞便可樂
bhai sy 35 5th gen nahi hain
兄弟,我們沒有35架第五代戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)。
Why is India not capable of making fighter jet engines ?
為什么印度無法制造戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)?
we have made jet engines of 70kn but we need engines of around 110 to 120 kN thrust engines .The development of engine takes time , USA and russian took multiple decades to reach where they are today hence we cant close this gap in short time .
我們已經(jīng)制造了70kN推力的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),但我們需要的是110至120kN推力的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的研發(fā)需要時(shí)間,美國(guó)和俄羅斯花費(fèi)了幾十年才達(dá)到今天的水平,因此我們無法在短時(shí)間內(nèi)縮小這一差距。
U know how many countries hold nukes? Total 9 ,but how many countries hold tech to make jet engines? Only 5 . Jet engines take 8 to 10 years and billions of dollars to make jet engines . China is becoming a threat to bharat sovereignty,so bharat doesn't have 10 years so that they can make engines that is why bharat is paying to other nation for jet engines tech .
你知道有多少個(gè)國(guó)家擁有核武器嗎?一共有9個(gè),但有多少個(gè)國(guó)家擁有制造噴氣發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的技術(shù)呢?只有5個(gè)。制造噴氣發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)需要8到10年的時(shí)間和數(shù)十億美元的投入。
中國(guó)正成為印度主權(quán)的威脅,因此印度沒有10年時(shí)間去制造發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),這也是印度為什么要向其他國(guó)家支付噴氣發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)技術(shù)費(fèi)用的原因。
Multiple test and research facilities and basic infrastructure needed for testing these are the complex things take much time to stabilize but Indian requirment are very quick. That's why we are taking readymade engine
需要多個(gè)測(cè)試和研究設(shè)施以及基礎(chǔ)設(shè)施來進(jìn)行測(cè)試,這些復(fù)雜的事情需要大量時(shí)間來穩(wěn)定,但印度的需求非常迫切。這就是為什么我們要使用現(xiàn)成的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。
When engineers from llt apply for ias then reservation keep good student from getting job.then what will happen
當(dāng)來自LLT的工程師申請(qǐng)IAS時(shí),預(yù)留名額會(huì)讓優(yōu)秀的學(xué)生失去工作機(jī)會(huì),那樣會(huì)發(fā)生什么呢?
Bcoz Congress did not focus much on India's self-reliance in defence.
因?yàn)閲?guó)大黨沒有過多關(guān)注印度在國(guó)防方面的自力更生。
Reservations...
預(yù)留名額……
India 50 saal se ek gas turbine nahi bana paya
印度已經(jīng)50年沒能制造出一款燃?xì)鉁u輪發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)了。
Check kaveei engine
檢查一下卡維里發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。
RIGHT SIR
沒錯(cuò),先生。
US Shocked
美國(guó)震驚了。
Why USA will sell engine you can't use
為什么美國(guó)會(huì)賣給你們不能使用的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)?
@HameedBaloch-z1y may be some secret plans
可能有一些秘密計(jì)劃。
Pata nahi kaha se news laatho ..or is channel ka mostly news ka koyi source nahi hota hai
不知道從哪里來的新聞,這個(gè)頻道的新聞大多數(shù)沒有來源。
Fake news
假新聞。
After that news ge bankcurput what the fuck ge ko india ke engine lene se utna hi farak padata hai jitna gadi ko oani se kuch nahi ge allredy production line are bussy to place orde korea usa 3000 engine in each year they are happy to time build more new engine for better performance
那條新聞之后,JEEP破產(chǎn)了,印度購(gòu)買發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)對(duì)他們來說影響不大,正如汽車無法行駛一樣。生產(chǎn)線已經(jīng)繁忙,每年韓國(guó)和美國(guó)生產(chǎn)3000臺(tái)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),他們很樂意花時(shí)間制造更多新發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)以提高性能。
Story telling mast karto ho sir aap. Please video short karo
您講的故事真棒,請(qǐng)把視頻做短一點(diǎn)。
?????? ?? ?????? ????? ?? ???? ???? ??????? ???? ??? ?????? ????? !
做關(guān)于國(guó)防的視頻之前請(qǐng)先了解充分的信息,然后再制作視頻!
Dont spread misinformation
不要傳播虛假信息。
Yeh American se kuch bhi mat kharido
不要從美國(guó)購(gòu)買任何東西。
Apna ammi beg white House me Trump ka bad garam karega
你們自己的母親會(huì)在白宮里讓特朗普生氣。
Bhai kya hai ye kam se kam sahi news aur thumbnail to likha karo kyu time waste karwate ho sbka
兄弟,這是什么?至少應(yīng)該寫好正確的新聞和縮略圖,為什么要浪費(fèi)大家的時(shí)間?
isko kuchh aata bhi hai...kuchh bhi bol raha hai?
他懂什么啊,亂說一通。
Apni lines ratta laga ke aa te ho...& baki ke time muh mein supari hoti hai kuch samajh nahi ata!
你只是背誦了一些臺(tái)詞,其余時(shí)間嘴里嚼著口香糖,完全不懂自己在說什么!
Completely baseless and misleading. Even don’t have a basic knowledge about the defence industry
完全沒有根據(jù),且具有誤導(dǎo)性。甚至連國(guó)防行業(yè)的基本知識(shí)都沒有。
Yeh American se kuch bhi mat kharido
不要從美國(guó)購(gòu)買任何東西。
Apna ammi beg white House me Trump ka bad garam karega
你們自己的母親會(huì)在白宮里讓特朗普生氣。
RD-33 engine, SFC Military thrust (dry / without afterburner) is 0.77 lb/(lbf·h)
F-404 engine SFC Military thrust 0.81 lb/(lbf?h)
In dry thrust RD-33 is more Fuel efficient than F-404, which is what is important, and RD-33MK have lifespan of 4500 Hours!
RD-33發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的SFC軍事推力(干推力/不帶加力燃燒室)為0.77 lb/(lbf·h)
F-404發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的SFC軍事推力為0.81 lb/(lbf·h)
在干推力情況下,RD-33比F-404更省油,這一點(diǎn)非常重要,而且RD-33MK的使用壽命可達(dá)4500小時(shí)!
Having the R33 accessories mounted on top of the motor is a maintenance nightmare. GE 404 has a PTO shaft on the it’s gearbox leading to an AMAD where the generator, air turbine stater, fuel and hydraulic pump are mounted. This simplifies engine changes.
將R33的附屬設(shè)備安裝在發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)上方是一個(gè)維護(hù)噩夢(mèng)。GE 404發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的齒輪箱上有一個(gè)PTO軸,連接到AMAD,AMAD上安裝了發(fā)電機(jī)、空氣渦輪啟動(dòng)器、燃油泵和液壓泵。這樣簡(jiǎn)化了發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)更換的過程。
You are not wrong, but should probably say that integral accessories would be a nightmare to maintain for an _F-404._
Overly simplified, the Klimov engine was designed to be “maintained“ by being wholly removed and another installed in its place.
你說得沒錯(cuò),但應(yīng)該說F-404的集成附屬設(shè)備會(huì)是一個(gè)維護(hù)噩夢(mèng)。簡(jiǎn)而言之,克里莫夫發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的設(shè)計(jì)是通過完全拆卸發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)并安裝另一個(gè)來進(jìn)行“維護(hù)”。
Just as the engine is more expensive, the maintenance of that engine is also more expensive, and the difference in fuel consumption is minimal...
正如發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)更貴一樣,維護(hù)成本也更高,而油耗的差異則微乎其微……
Both great engines designed by smart engineers. The difference are a result of the different design ethos and technical requirements of the different countries.
The American engine was designed to be technically advanced while the klimov was designed as a military engine for war, meaning it has to perform at higher loads increasing survivability at battle theatres. Most jets when they go to war are not expected to fly for long unlike a commercial jet hence building a long lasting engine wasn't a real requirement and fuel efficiency, well its russian. Russia is the home of fuel.
So both designs are great for whatever they were envisioned for.
這兩款發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)都由聰明的工程師設(shè)計(jì)。它們的差異源于不同國(guó)家的設(shè)計(jì)理念和技術(shù)需求。
美國(guó)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的設(shè)計(jì)目的是技術(shù)先進(jìn),而克里莫夫發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)則是為了戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)設(shè)計(jì)的軍事發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),這意味著它必須在更高負(fù)載下運(yùn)行,以提高在戰(zhàn)斗環(huán)境中的生存能力。大多數(shù)戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)在戰(zhàn)爭(zhēng)中并不要求飛行很長(zhǎng)時(shí)間,這與民航飛機(jī)不同,因此制造一款持久耐用的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)并不是一個(gè)真正的需求,而油耗效率嘛,那是俄羅斯的優(yōu)勢(shì)。俄羅斯是燃料的故鄉(xiāng)。
因此,這兩種設(shè)計(jì)在它們預(yù)定的用途上都非常優(yōu)秀。
It doesnt matter how much fuel there is in russia. Only how much there is inside the aircraft. Fuel efficiency equals more range.
俄羅斯的燃料儲(chǔ)量多少并不重要,重要的是飛機(jī)內(nèi)部的燃料量。燃油效率等于更遠(yuǎn)的航程。
1/ Who still thinks in inches and pounds? 2/Soviet engines were optimized for interception of incoming aggressors and defence at shorter distances, while US ones are optimised for long flights and hard to predict attacks.
1/ 還有誰(shuí)會(huì)用英寸和磅來思考?
2/ 蘇聯(lián)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì)是為了攔截來襲的敵人并進(jìn)行近距離防御,而美國(guó)的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)則優(yōu)化設(shè)計(jì)用于長(zhǎng)途飛行和應(yīng)對(duì)難以預(yù)測(cè)的攻擊。
Regarding maintenance what matters is how easily and quickly the engines can be replaced in the field with maintenance done in the rear of any war zone.
關(guān)于維護(hù),重要的是發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)在戰(zhàn)場(chǎng)上的更換是否便捷迅速,同時(shí)維護(hù)可以在任何戰(zhàn)區(qū)后方進(jìn)行。
la información es errónea, el rd 33 inició su desarrollo a principios de los 70 y no los 80. El dise?o también es modular.
信息錯(cuò)誤,RD-33的開發(fā)始于70年代初,而不是80年代。其設(shè)計(jì)也是模塊化的。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
But it's high on maintenance.
但它的維護(hù)成本很高。
@willisfernandes2366 si, pero es distinto el cálculo actual que el de la era soviética. Hoy los motores tienen una menor diferencia de precio al adquirirlos , pero bajo el sistema soviético la diferencia del costo era enorme y por eso la vida útil no era tan importante. Cuando cayó la URSS en los hangares había enormes cantidades de motores nuevos en cajas , era más práctico para ellos un motor que duraba 1500 horas y costaba 350000 dólares y solo desecharlo que hacer uno que dure 6/7000
是的,但當(dāng)前的計(jì)算與蘇聯(lián)時(shí)代不同。今天發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的采購(gòu)價(jià)格差異較小,但在蘇聯(lián)體制下,成本差異巨大,因此發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的使用壽命并不是那么重要。當(dāng)蘇聯(lián)解體時(shí),許多新的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)仍在倉(cāng)庫(kù)里封存,他們更傾向于使用那種使用壽命為1500小時(shí)、價(jià)格為35萬(wàn)美元的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī),并且只是用完就丟掉,而不是制造一個(gè)使用壽命為6000-7000小時(shí)的發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。
The presentation was made laudatory for the F404, the maintenance was done only in special places. In the presentation, production data for the RD-33 is omitted/missing and it is desired that the RD-33 comes from the Stone Age, it is known that maintenance for Soviet aircraft can be done at any type of airport, fuel is not a problem, and the reduced cost meant more units produced.
這次展示對(duì)F404進(jìn)行了稱贊,維護(hù)只能在特定地點(diǎn)進(jìn)行。在展示中,RD-33的生產(chǎn)數(shù)據(jù)被省略/遺漏,似乎暗示RD-33來自石器時(shí)代。實(shí)際上,蘇聯(lián)的飛機(jī)可以在任何類型的機(jī)場(chǎng)進(jìn)行維護(hù),燃料不是問題,成本降低意味著生產(chǎn)更多單位。
India lost a fighter jet due to American engine failure, so despite of the high maintenance cost, robust performance matters. So India should consider a plan B, another version of Tejas with Russian engine
印度因美國(guó)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)故障損失了一架戰(zhàn)斗機(jī),因此盡管維護(hù)成本較高,可靠的性能更為重要。所以印度應(yīng)該考慮B計(jì)劃,推出搭載俄羅斯發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)的另一版本Tejas戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)。
原創(chuàng)翻譯:龍騰網(wǎng) http://mintwatchbillionaireclub.com 轉(zhuǎn)載請(qǐng)注明出處
Also made me very uncomfortable
這也讓我感到非常不舒服。 正在拖延,因此它可能會(huì)選擇法國(guó)和英國(guó)的羅羅發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)。
Klimov is expensive even if given free. It doesn't hold a second light to F404. I know. I designed Fighter Aircraft Engines systems.
即使免費(fèi)的,卡里莫夫也很貴。它根本無法與F404相提并論。我知道,我設(shè)計(jì)過戰(zhàn)斗機(jī)發(fā)動(dòng)機(jī)系統(tǒng)。
F404 has failed. Lead to crash. It's trash. But ofc murica. Feet and pounds. Ridiculous units of measurements.
F404已經(jīng)失敗,導(dǎo)致了墜機(jī)。它是垃圾。但當(dāng)然,美國(guó)總是這樣。英尺和磅。真是荒謬的計(jì)量單位。